Forschungsprojekt Master U.
Kleine Städte – große Transformation?! Stadtplanerische Herausforderungen und Gestaltungsspielräume in Kleinstädten in der Lausitz
Semester: Wintersemester 22/23
M.Sc. Urbanistik 1. FS. Forschungsprojekt
Professur Stadtplanung
Veranstaltungsart: Projekt / 8 SWS / 12 ECTS
Teilnehmer*innenzahl: max. 20
Termine: donnerstags, 9:15 bis 16:45 Uhr
Sprache: deutsch
Ort: R004, Bauhausstraße 7b / R004
Dozent*innen: Vertr.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sandra Huning
Die Einschreibung erfolgt online via BISON.
Seit mehr als einem Jahrhundert ist die Lausitz durch die Braunkohleförderung geprägt. Nach dem politischen Beschluss zum Kohleausstieg soll die Lausitz zur Modellregion der Energiewende werden. Dabei geht es um ökonomische Fragen, aber auch die Weiterentwicklung von Kulturlandschaften, Wohnraumversorgung und Infrastrukturen sowie ökonomische und politische Teilhabe.
In vielen Kleinstädten in der Lausitz waren angesichts von demografischem Wandel und geringen Steuereinnahmen die Sicherung der Daseinsvorsorge und die Aufrechterhaltung von Kultur-, Bildungs- und Freizeitangeboten die zentralen Themen der letzten Jahrzehnte. Die neuen Rahmenbedingungen kehren frühere Trends z. T. um und bringen neue Herausforderungen für Stadtplanung und Stadtentwicklung mit sich, z. B. den Zuzug von Fachkräften, eine steigende Wohnungs- und Infrastrukturnachfrage und die Gestaltung des Zusammenlebens von Alteingesessenen und Zugezogenen. Hier stellen sich auch Fragen nach lokaler und regionaler Identität, Empowerment und nach Möglichkeits- und Experimentierräumen, um lokale Innovationen anzustoßen.
Das Forschungsprojekt widmet sich aktuellen Herausforderungen und Gestaltungsspielräumen in Kleinstädten in der Lausitz. Wie spiegeln sich Transformationsdiskurse in den Kommunen? Welche Strategien für eine zukunftsfähige Stadtentwicklung entwickeln Planer*innen, und wo sehen sie den größten Handlungsbedarf? Auf welche Planungsinstrumente, Ressourcen und Kompetenzen greifen sie zurück, und welche Hemmnisse und Barrieren gibt es? Aufbauend auf dem wissenschaftlichen Stand der Forschung, entwickeln die Teilnehmer*innen ein Untersuchungsdesign und bearbeiten in Kleingruppen eine empirische Fallstudie mit selbst gewähltem Schwerpunkt. Ziel des Forschungsprojekts ist die Reflexion kommunaler Entwicklungsperspektiven und Handlungsoptionen im Spiegel der „großen Transformation“ in der Kohleregion Lausitz. Zum Abschluss präsentieren die Teilnehmer*innen ihre Ergebnisse mündlich und dokumentieren sie in einem gemeinsamen Abschlussbericht. Die regelmäßige aktive Teilnahme wird erwartet.
Study Project Master EUS
Fearless politics. Municipalist movements and the difficulty of the plains
 A joint study project of the universities of Barcelona, Weimar, and Zadar
Semester: Summer semester 2023
M.Sc. European Urban Studies, 2. FS. Study Project
Type of Course: Project / 8 SWS / 12 ECTS
Number of participants: max. 15
Language: English
Teacher: Dr. Timmo Krüger (Bauhaus-Universität Weimar)
Co-teacher(s):
 Dr. Federico Demaria (Universitat de Barcelona)
 Dr. Sc. Karin Doolan (Sveučilište u Zadru)
 
here you can download the Booklet PDF
The challenges of the  socio-ecological crisis are immense and affect  basic structures of  modern societies. Questions of social justice and  effective climate  change mitigation cannot be considered independently  of questions  regarding the hegemonic mode of living. To what extent can  and should  growth-based norms of production and consumption be  maintained? Who can  or should give up privileges of the imperial mode  of living? Whose  interests can or should be particularly respected?  Given these  distributional implications, it is not surprising that  conflicts over  social transformation processes are increasing. At the  same time,  European societies are increasingly experiencing a crisis of  democracy.  Input, throughput and output legitimacy of representative  democracies  are eroding. In their criticism of pluralistic democratic  institutions  (e.g., minority rights and freedom of the press),  right-wing  authoritarian movements and parties tie in with these crisis  phenomena  and at the same time exacerbate them. On the other side of  the conflict  spectrum, social movement actors link the demand for  (climate, social)  justice with the demand for the expansion and  intensification of  democracy.
 
 In this context, municipalist  movements stand out because they pursue  both parliamentary and  extra-parliamentary strategies to orient urban  infrastructures and  institutions towards a common good approach. It is  precisely this  duality of exercising power through pressure from the  streets and  through government policy that is a strength of municipalist  movements,  but it also leads to internal negotiations and strategy  discussions.  With the electoral successes of Barcelona en Comú (2015),  Zagreb je  NAŠ! (2021) and other municipalist movement parties around the  world,  new understandings of politics have entered local politics and  urban  planning. Thus, municipalist movement parties who are in  government  strengthen grassroot democratic elements and strive for  "obedient  governance" to create a new relationship between local  politics, social  movements and city dwellers. This is already evident in  the names of  the movement parties – e.g. "Barcelona en Comú" could be  translated as  "Barcelona in Common" and "Zagreb je NAŠ!" as "Zagreb is  OURS!". In  addition to the demand for political participation, the names  also  reveal an explicit focus on the scalar level of the municipality.  It is  an urban setting in which municipalist movements seek answers to   socio-ecological and democratic challenges. Municipalist movements thus   hold the promise of opening up the political scope for imaginative   (urban) visions, while at the same time testing very concrete   transformative urban policy and planning tools. 
 
 The selected  comparative cases of Barcelona and Zagreb share  similarities, e.g., a  municipalist movement party in charge of  governance, a city in Southern  Europe, but have also some differences.  In Barcelona, the municipalist  movement has been active and in power for  a comparatively long time.  Barcelona en Comú stands for a courage to  implement concrete utopias,  which the movement carries into the world  with its congress "Fearless  Cities" (2017) and the network of the same  name. In this respect,  Barcelona en Comú is a role model for many  actors. Zagreb je NAŠ! also  explicitly follows the example of Barcelona  en Comú, but in part faces  completely different challenges and is  looking for locally appropriate  strategies. A special focus of Zagreb je  NAŠ! is the systematic linking  of environmental protection and justice  issues. In the Study Project  we deal primarily with the very current  developments in Zagreb, the  destination of the study-trip. Barcelona,  however, is an important case  of comparison for us, as it is for the  protagonists of Zagreb je NAŠ!  themselves. 
 
 In the Study Project we will examine very specific  planning projects,  tools and programs from Zagreb and Barcelona and  investigate the  following questions:
- What is the relationship between city administration, local politics, and civil society initiatives? What tensions and conflicts, but also new forms of productive cooperation can be observed?
 - How does Zagreb je NAŠ!’s and Barcelona en Comú’s intensive engagement with the challenges of the democracy crisis affect their day-to-day government and administration? To what extent (and by which actors) are the measures taken democratize of urban planning and local politics considered to be successful?
 - With which politics of scale do the municipalist movements in Zagreb and Barcelona react to the interdependence of global and local causes and consequences of the socio-ecological crisis? To what extent and by what means is the ambition to deal with socio-ecological challenges at the municipal level extended to phenomena of supra-regional and global crises (climate change, etc.)? And with which strategies are local effects of global socio-ecological crises addressed by influencing supra-regional to transnational scales?