Search

Frequently Searched Pages

Deutsch

Accessibility

Zahl 30 als Symbol für das Namensjubiläum der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

Research projects: Master’s programme U.

Universities as instruments of spatial development. An assessment of Thuringian state policy from a planning science perspective.

Semester: winter semester 20/21

Prof. Dr Max Welch Guerra   

M.Sc. Urbanism, 1st semester. Research project

12 LP/8 SWS

Tuesday, 9.15 am – 4.45 pm
Examination: Final presentation

How can long-term spatial changes be assessed? How can we evaluate public development programmes? Such questions are asked far too rarely, even in the Federal Republic of Germany, yet the assessment of both seemingly spontaneous and deliberately engineered spatial development is one of the prerequisites for democratic and nature-friendly public planning. 

Thirty years after the formation of the Free State of Thuringia, we are reconstructing the real-world and intellectual history of a policy area that has a great deal to do with us: higher education policy. There has been, and continues to be, hardly any coherent discussion of this, yet the expansion of colleges and universities since 1990 has been considerable. Once location decisions have been taken, they shape the state’s settlement structure and, in the broadest sense, its cultural development for decades. To what extent has this been successful? And what of Thuringia’s academic profile that has emerged as a result? How does this relate to the Free State’s shortcomings and opportunities for development? What responsibility does Thuringia assume in the face of the pressing problems of global development in nature and society?

Our subject matter is complex. We must take into account, for example, the interdependence of state and federal policy, the interweaving of higher education and economic policy, but also the independence of the universities and individual towns. The resulting configuration can be grasped fairly well in some respects – for instance, in spatial and financial terms – as we are dealing with visible Urban Design and verifiable public investment. It becomes more difficult when we examine the indirect effects of the existence of universities of applied sciences and universities. Policy evaluation criteria must be discussed, conflicting objectives taken into account, and broader trends considered in conjunction with specific measures. 

The final report of our urbanism research project must be comprehensible and informative for the public in Thuringia. However, it should also highlight the field of higher education policy – which has hitherto been barely visible in the state – and, in doing so, offer guidance for the future that we can justify on the basis of the binding nature of planning sciences.