IFD:Designing For Action/Webtop: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

IFD:Designing For Action/Webtop (view source)

Revision as of 11:42, 18 March 2011

613 bytes added , 18 March 2011

no edit summary

Ericreiss

5

edits

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 '''Widgets/WebApps (however its called in ten years)'''
-Very very less people really need offline webapps (the cache was a really good invention.. and it works.. offline). But the worst thing - there is no good concept to integrate these so called webapps in the browser.
+There is no good concept to integrate widgets or webapps in the browser.
 '''So what is the browser?'''
-The browser isnt just another program. Its an abstraction layer and so we need an interface to do all the things that are possible. Now that all work and fun happens in the browser, the browser does all things, the os-interface does, we need an interface that is same as powerful as the desktop/explorer.
+The browser isnt just another program. Its an abstraction layer for the www and so we need an interface to do all the things that are possible within the www. Now that all work and fun happens in the browser, the browser does all things, the os-interface does, we need an interface that is same as powerful as the desktop/explorer.
 ===Why are current systems unable to solve this problem?===
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 Overall, you've identified some real problems (and challenges) with the current state of bookmarks. There's an opportunity to make things better. I'd like to hear more details about your idea and designs, but unfortunately they are not available on this wiki as I'm writing this (date: 7 March 2011).
+===Eric Reiss===
+I liked the statement of the problem. Jim has already pointed out some basic flaws in the presentation (e.g. the use of "of course"). But my greatest problem was that I couldn't really figure out your solution based on the deliverables presented here. The needlessly noisy video would have done better with a verbal description of what was happening on-screen instead of the irrelevant music.
+A short statement that described how your application has solved the basic problems of bookmarking (that links/media go out of date or cannot be bookmarked at all) would have helped a lot. Although your ideas may be great, you have simply not succeeded in proving to me that you have done something truly remarkable.