GMU:Re-enchanting the field/Rieke Hettinger: Difference between revisions

GMU:Re-enchanting the field/Rieke Hettinger (view source)

Revision as of 11:03, 11 September 2025

4 bytes added , Yesterday at 11:03

dfgd

Reekz

77

edits

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 Just like in the ancient myth and today in industry. I liked the pragmatic freedom we took.
-I must admit that, since you explained your thoughts, I've never been able to quote you exactly.[Possible reasons].
+I must admit that, since you explained your thoughts,
+I've never been able to quote you exactly.[Possible reasons].
 I shared the perception of the playground regarding the mountain of oil-shell residue.
 I could see the potential of having a mountain in an area without mountains. For example, the view.
@@ Line 47: / Line 48: @@
 but there are stones that are millions of years old.'
 We go on hiking trips in so-called nature, and fail to recognize,
-that the environment has been shaped by humans.' My usage of the term 'nature' in both German and English does not include our relationship with it. When we are in the oil shell landscape, terms emerge to describe our connection with it.
+that the environment has been shaped by humans.'
+My usage of the term 'nature' in both German and English does not include our relationship with it.
+When we are in the oil shell landscape, terms emerge to describe our connection with it.
 These terms may be 'pure', 'wounded', 'fake', 'disturbed', and so on.
-The way in which these terms are used do not provide a comprehensive description of our relationship with nature.
+The way in which these terms are used do not provide a comprehensive description
+of our relationship with nature.
 The lack of connotation shows me how underdeveloped our relationship with nature is.