IFD:IntimateInterfaces/EvaluationRubric: Difference between revisions

From Medien Wiki
(Created page with "'''''Intimate Interfaces: Evaluation Rubric''''' Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric: 30% Attendance and Participation<br /> 30% We...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:
Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources.<br />The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources.<br />The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.


[https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Acknowledging_Sources.pdf Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)]<br />
[https://dept.writing.wisc.edu/wac/acknowledging-paraphrasing-and-quoting-sources/ Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)]<br />
[http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/ What is Plagiarism?]<br />
[http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/ What is Plagiarism?]<br />

Latest revision as of 10:51, 12 May 2020

Intimate Interfaces: Evaluation Rubric

Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

30% Attendance and Participation
30% Weekly Assignments (including Midterm Presentation)
40% Final Deliverable and Documentation (including Final Presentation)


Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources.
The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.

Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)
What is Plagiarism?