GMU:Sustainable Aesthetics/Friedrich Wilhelm Albrecht Pittelkow: Difference between revisions

From Medien Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Also, art is reproducible through severely processes, especially digital art, which can be reproduced without loss in ''quality''.
Also, art is reproducible through severely processes, especially digital art, which can be reproduced without loss in ''quality''.
An interesting question is: How can we create digital art and their available aesthetics, and therefore is easily reproduced but has a sustainable economic and ecological value?
An interesting question is: How can we create digital art and their available aesthetics, and therefore is easily reproduced but has a sustainable economic and ecological value?
For the project, I want to explore my Idea to create art though science described mathematics. 


Nothing is so sustainable as natural science and natural constants, e.g. the Planck constant, which is fundamental for quantum physics, the fundamental of everything, or the Planck length that describes the shortest (known) length possible. All these can described by a mathematical equation.
Nothing is so sustainable as natural science and natural constants, e.g. the Planck constant, which is fundamental for quantum physics, the fundamental of everything, or the Planck length that describes the shortest (known) length possible. All these can described by a mathematical equation.

Revision as of 05:30, 17 November 2022

Aesthetics isn't only a surface, an Image, a branding, but it's also an atmosphere in which experience happens. You could state, that the fictional world dominates the real world. You can see this in economy where e.g. advertisement and materials shapes a view on products and their value (and also politics). Since art is not created in a vacuum, the reception changes over time. That creates the problem, that the meaning of an art piece is not always sustainable in the intended way.

Also, art is reproducible through severely processes, especially digital art, which can be reproduced without loss in quality. An interesting question is: How can we create digital art and their available aesthetics, and therefore is easily reproduced but has a sustainable economic and ecological value?

Nothing is so sustainable as natural science and natural constants, e.g. the Planck constant, which is fundamental for quantum physics, the fundamental of everything, or the Planck length that describes the shortest (known) length possible. All these can described by a mathematical equation.

It should be possible to create an artwork based on a set of equations. Let's think about a painting as an example. Each point on the canvas can be described by a coordinate and a color. Each of this is described by a set of equations. This is the output of said set. But this set has also inputs in the form of variables and constants. The variables can be changed. Where the same variables create the same output each time.

So, the artwork is not the output itself, but the act of creating it.

Forgotten electronics → Circuit anarchy

Old electronics, that we once valued, are going to waste and are really recycled. Precious materials go to waste and the energy that used for the initial production can never be recovered.

For the project, old electronics, which would be discarded, are reused to create different sounds and a soundscape. Therefore, different technics such as circuit bending and the recording of electromagnetic fields. Circuit bending is the technic of rewiring existing circuits to expand or change their intended use.

The recording provided below is a recording of the electromagnetic field produced by a broken wireless headphone.

File:fr_elec1.mp3