GMU:Critical VR Lab II/Kristin Jakubek: Difference between revisions

Line 205:

This semester I mainly started work on creating my own visual elements, using photogrammetry as technique to transport places, textures and people from the real into the rendered mesh.

[[:File:meshes_process.pdf]]

I used a range of different photogrammetry softwares:

For mobile, quick and relatively small/compact models I used the Trnio app, which uses approx. 80 pictures, which was sufficient for static captures: the street renderings.

File:meshes_process_1 20.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 21.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 22.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 23.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 24.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 25.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 26.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 27.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 28.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 29.jpg

File:meshes_process_1 30.jpg

</gallery>

During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:

Line 228:

Line 251:

</gallery>

~~[[:File:meshes_process.pdf]]~~

~~I used a range of different photogrammetry softwares:~~

~~For mobile, quick and relatively small/compact models I used the Trnio app, which uses approx. 80 pictures, which was sufficient for static captures: the street renderings.~~

~~During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:~~

When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results.

@@ Line 205: / Line 205: @@
 This semester I mainly started work on creating my own visual elements, using photogrammetry as technique to transport places, textures and people from the real into the rendered mesh.
+[[:File:meshes_process.pdf]]
+I used a range of different photogrammetry softwares:
+For mobile, quick and relatively small/compact models I used the Trnio app, which uses approx. 80 pictures, which was sufficient for static captures: the street renderings.
+<gallery>
+File:meshes_process_1 20.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 21.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 22.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 23.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 24.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 25.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 26.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 27.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 28.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 29.jpg
+File:meshes_process_1 30.jpg
+</gallery>
+During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:
 <gallery>
@@ Line 228: / Line 251: @@
 </gallery>
-[[:File:meshes_process.pdf]]
-I used a range of different photogrammetry softwares:
-For mobile, quick and relatively small/compact models I used the Trnio app, which uses approx. 80 pictures, which was sufficient for static captures: the street renderings.
-During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:
 When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results.