User:Marie EBEL: Difference between revisions

385 editsJoined 6 November 2017
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 115: Line 115:


Based on this new pattern, I decided to change my angle. I attacked the problem the other way around. I found a scientific paper that refers to a primer that defines subhaplogroups. This paper completes the DNA sequencing that covers virtually all (sub)haplogroups discernible to date in East Asia. It can serve as a solid basis for phylogeographic (also deduced from the complete human genome) to define whether this primer would run samples of my own DNA. If that is the case, it could mean that I do carry some makers usually associate to East Asian genome, but it could also lead to a quite unusual conclusion: Genetics is manipulable.
Based on this new pattern, I decided to change my angle. I attacked the problem the other way around. I found a scientific paper that refers to a primer that defines subhaplogroups. This paper completes the DNA sequencing that covers virtually all (sub)haplogroups discernible to date in East Asia. It can serve as a solid basis for phylogeographic (also deduced from the complete human genome) to define whether this primer would run samples of my own DNA. If that is the case, it could mean that I do carry some makers usually associate to East Asian genome, but it could also lead to a quite unusual conclusion: Genetics is manipulable.
[[File:Ritual1.png|400px]]
[[File:Ritual2.png|400px]]
[[File:Ritual3.png|400px]]
[[File:Ritual4.png|400px]]
[[File:Ritual5.png|400px]]
[[File:Ritual6.png|400px]]
[[File:Ritual7.png|400px]]