IFD:DUPL/EvaluationRubric: Difference between revisions

From Medien Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
40% Final Deliverable and Documentation (including Final Presentation)<br />
40% Final Deliverable and Documentation (including Final Presentation)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources.<br />The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources. The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
<br />
<br /><br />
[https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Acknowledging_Sources.pdf Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)]<br />
[https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Acknowledging_Sources.pdf Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)]<br />
[http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/ What is Plagiarism?]<br />
[http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/ What is Plagiarism?]<br />

Latest revision as of 14:29, 9 April 2018

Dystopic/Utopic Prototype Lab: Evaluation Rubric


Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

30% Attendance and Participation
30% Weekly Assignments (including Midterm Presentation)
40% Final Deliverable and Documentation (including Final Presentation)

Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources. The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.

Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)
What is Plagiarism?