IFD:HumanCenteredDesignResearch SoSe13/team2 generalPresentation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

IFD:HumanCenteredDesignResearch SoSe13/team2 generalPresentation (view source)

Revision as of 11:37, 12 August 2013

257 bytes added , 12 August 2013

no edit summary

Lisa.guth

127

edits

@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 Stage 2 would adjust possible options according to the media type selected in stage 1. I.e. it does not make sense to upload images or video to a platform like soundcloud.
 After the user has made a selection at stage 3 the software should warn him if one or more of his chosen combinations of platforms and license collide with potential clauses in the terms of service of a platform.
+[[Image:Hcd_android_share.png|200px|thumb|Possible integration in the "share function" on mobile platforms]]
+We deliberately chose a screen format for our application which can be easily adapted to mobile platforms (smartphones, tablets). We imagine that our solution is not only suitable for desktop use in times where more and more people handle their tasks using mobile devices.
 During our midterm presentation one of our mentors mentioned that we should focus on identifying the pain of users of our target group and try to ease it. After a reassessment of our conducted interviews we made the assumption, that creators struggle with the proper attribution of a license or their copyright information of their published work. At this point in time, services like facebook or tumblr do not offer their users to select and attribute a CC license to content they upload on their platform. In case the user wants to attribute basic copyright information or a CC license, he would need to manually add this information (i.e. by watermarking images, adding an intro or outro to a video, or add meta information like an ID3 tag for mp3 files). This process can be rather time consuming, especially if different attributions have to be made for different platforms (i.e. watermarking an image for tumblr, adding a caption containing the information on facebook).
@@ Line 112: / Line 116: @@
 <gallery>
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_1.png|start screen
+File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_13.png|start screen + help
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_2.png|Choose your file
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_3.png|Choose your license
+File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_14.png|Choose your license + help
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_11.png|Choose your last license
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_4.png|Choose your platforms
@@ Line 121: / Line 127: @@
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_6.png|Settings
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_9.png|History abstract
+File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_12.png|History abstract + help
 File:hcd_g2_papermockup4_10.png|History detailed
 </gallery>
-In our new proposed solution we would offer the user a tiny license manager interface which would initially provide a default license corresponding to "all rights reserved". We deliberately chose an empty looking tag icon similar to those provided by Creative Commons, and would arrange those in view to spark the users interest in the CC licenses just because of their look. As soon as a license has been chosen the software would provide an option for the most common blogging platforms (tumblr, soup.io, wordpress, facebook, google+, etc). In case the user choses a platform whose own license agreements for publishing material collide with a Creative Commons license it warns the user about arising difficulties concerning his rights. Through this methology we achieve our goal of creating interest in the CC model and are able to educate the user during his usual workflow.
-During the course we want to conduct a quantitive user study if there exists a particular interest in such a software. At the moment we concentrate on developing a testable prototype and invited our previous participants to take part in such a study.
 ==Scenario==
@@ Line 191: / Line 193: @@
 ==User study==
+During the course we conducted a quantitive user study to verify our assumptions if there is a real need for creative users to attribute their work and publish on several online platforms.
+[[Media:Poll_HCD.pdf]]
 ==Poster - summaery==
@@ Line 196: / Line 201: @@
 ==Our conclusion==
+We can say that we were introduced to a robust set of tools to tackle different problems arising during the human centered design process. The course offered us a good opportunity to experiment with different approaches of designing a software solution. We underestimated the huge effort we had to invest into our final prototype. The component of abolishing ideas during different iterations in the process was a painful but educative experience. Several participants of our user studies showed great interest in our proposed solution, so we would like to actually implement our idea and test it under real life conditions.