IFD:HumanCenteredDesignResearch SoSe13/team1 generalPresentation - Revision history

Quyu4945: /* External Program */

2013-08-12T14:07:53Z

External Program

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 12 August 2013
Line 118:		Line 118:
	The paper-mock-up of the external program is generated with the prototyping-tool Evolus Pencil Project. In this case we had some problems with printing, because the proportions wasn't correct and sometimes the program deleted some fields. All in all it was easier to generate the prototype with a prototyping tool than to draw all things.		The paper-mock-up of the external program is generated with the prototyping-tool Evolus Pencil Project. In this case we had some problems with printing, because the proportions wasn't correct and sometimes the program deleted some fields. All in all it was easier to generate the prototype with a prototyping tool than to draw all things.

	This is a revision ~~from~~ the first prototype and this are the new ~~funktions~~:		This is a revision of the first prototype and this are the new functions:
	* We added a new ~~funktion~~ to the search filter that people who don`t know the CC-licenses can say for what they need the pictures they search and the filter choose the licenses which are Ok for this.		* we added a new function to the search filter that people who don't know the CC-licenses can say for what they need the pictures; they search and the filter choose the licenses which are good for this.
	* ~~The User~~ can see the workspace and the search at the same time.		* the user can see the workspace and the search at the same time
	* A new ~~funktion~~ to see the data ~~from~~ choosen pictures.		* a new function to see the data of the choosen pictures
	* A help ~~funktion~~ for the different licenses		* a help function for the different licenses
	* better ~~funktion~~ to switch between workspaces		* better function to switch between workspaces

	<gallery>		<gallery>

Quyu4945: /* Ideas */

2013-08-12T14:04:20Z

Ideas

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 12 August 2013
Line 68:		Line 68:
	==Ideas==		==Ideas==
	For the Ideas we took the data from our research and we wanted to remove the problems, which we found. For this each of us generated for himself ideas and than we took them together in a mindmap.		For the Ideas we took the data from our research and we wanted to remove the problems, which we found. For this each of us generated for himself ideas and than we took them together in a mindmap.


	===1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES===		===1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES===
	[[File:Hcdr_team1_trading_place_idea.jpg \| thumb \| right \| overview]]		[[File:Hcdr_team1_trading_place_idea.jpg \| thumb \| right \| overview]]

Quyu4945: /* Ideas */

2013-08-12T14:03:58Z

Ideas

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 12 August 2013
Line 67:		Line 67:

	==Ideas==		==Ideas==
			For the Ideas we took the data from our research and we wanted to remove the problems, which we found. For this each of us generated for himself ideas and than we took them together in a mindmap.


	* For the Ideas we took the data from our research and we wanted to remove the problems we found. For this each ~~took~~ for himself ideas and than we took them together in a mindmap.

Bipe7922: /* External Program */

2013-08-12T13:01:20Z

External Program

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 12 August 2013
Line 122:		Line 122:
	====External Program====		====External Program====
	The paper-mock-up of the external program is generated with the prototyping-tool Evolus Pencil Project. In this case we had some problems with printing, because the proportions wasn't correct and sometimes the program deleted some fields. All in all it was easier to generate the prototype with a prototyping tool than to draw all things.		The paper-mock-up of the external program is generated with the prototyping-tool Evolus Pencil Project. In this case we had some problems with printing, because the proportions wasn't correct and sometimes the program deleted some fields. All in all it was easier to generate the prototype with a prototyping tool than to draw all things.

			This is a revision from the first prototype and this are the new funktions:
			* We added a new funktion to the search filter that people who don`t know the CC-licenses can say for what they need the pictures they search and the filter choose the licenses which are Ok for this.
			* The User can see the workspace and the search at the same time.
			* A new funktion to see the data from choosen pictures.
			* A help funktion for the different licenses
			* better funktion to switch between workspaces

	<gallery>		<gallery>

Bipe7922: /* Our Presentations In The Course */

2013-08-12T12:45:00Z

Our Presentations In The Course

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 12 August 2013
Line 174:		Line 174:

	==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap===		==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap===
			It was not a big problem to make a presentation on this theme. The sources were very good and easy to understand although the topic was not new for me because I had it before in an other course. I only had problems with the decision which example of Intuitive I present but than I took them from the sources. I think that now eveyone who saw the presentation know what Intuitive and the Intuition Gap is.
	===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===		===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===
	Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>		Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>
	It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool. My own goal was, that the others have a little overview of the existing prototyping-tools and maybe also that they can decide which one is good for their own idea.		It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool. My own goal was, that the others have a little overview of the existing prototyping-tools and maybe also that they can decide which one is good for their own idea.

Bipe7922: /* Ideas */

2013-08-12T12:22:17Z

Ideas

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 12 August 2013
Line 67:		Line 67:

	==Ideas==		==Ideas==



			* For the Ideas we took the data from our research and we wanted to remove the problems we found. For this each took for himself ideas and than we took them together in a mindmap.


	===1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES===		===1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES===
	[[File:Hcdr_team1_trading_place_idea.jpg \| thumb \| right \| overview]]		[[File:Hcdr_team1_trading_place_idea.jpg \| thumb \| right \| overview]]

Bipe7922: /* User Research */

2013-08-12T12:03:12Z

User Research

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 12 August 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* our criteria for selecting the interview participants was that people publish something on-line		* our criteria for selecting the interview participants was that people publish something on-line
	* we knew all people personally and so we also knew, that they publish something on-line		* we knew all people personally and so we also knew, that they publish something on-line
			* we were looking for participants with a Doodle List and the Piazza but unfortunately there were only a few people who contact us.
	* it was difficult to find people and specially professional artists, because you can't find very easy, who use Creative Commons and who not, if you don't know the interview participants		* it was difficult to find people and specially professional artists, because you can't find very easy, who use Creative Commons and who not, if you don't know the interview participants
	* we asked some pre-formulated questions but we also added some other during the interview		* we asked some pre-formulated questions but we also added some other during the interview

Bianca.mueller: /* Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration */

2013-08-12T07:16:01Z

Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 12 August 2013
Line 162:		Line 162:
	During the course everyone held a presentation and in the following we want to say something about our experience and problems with our themes.		During the course everyone held a presentation and in the following we want to say something about our experience and problems with our themes.
	===Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration===		===Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration===


			In general it wasn't a big problem to give a lecture on this theme. Although one somehow confusing and discouraging aspect was the structure of text. The author repeated himself a lot in his essay. He summed up some aspects more than one time. In my presentation I was willing not to imitate the structure style of the author but in some points I had to repeat myself as well.

	==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap===		==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap===
	===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===		===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===
	Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>		Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>
	It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool. My own goal was, that the others have a little overview of the existing prototyping-tools and maybe also that they can decide which one is good for their own idea.		It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool. My own goal was, that the others have a little overview of the existing prototyping-tools and maybe also that they can decide which one is good for their own idea.

Quyu4945: /* Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery */

2013-08-11T21:25:23Z

Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 11 August 2013
Line 165:		Line 165:
	===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===		===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===
	Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>		Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>
	It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool.		It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool. My own goal was, that the others have a little overview of the existing prototyping-tools and maybe also that they can decide which one is good for their own idea.

Quyu4945: /* Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery */

2013-08-11T21:21:08Z

Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 11 August 2013
Line 164:		Line 164:
	==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap===		==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap===
	===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===		===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery===
	Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation)		Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/>
			It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool.