GMU:Critical VR Lab II/Kristin Jakubek - Revision history

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Inside Unity */

2020-10-30T18:44:56Z

Inside Unity

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 30 October 2020
Line 321:		Line 321:
	'''Body-street-scapes'''		'''Body-street-scapes'''

	The street elements will function as facade like foldings that collapse into themselves.		The street elements will function as facade-like foldings that collapse into themselves.

	The intensity of the external spaces is increased by working with simulating weather conditions that invoke sensory memories of a heatwave, the smell of hot pavement or cooling summer rain on the asphalt. A blurring, wavering heat distortion effect, a damp fog or wet puddles on the pavement.		The intensity of the external spaces is increased by working with simulating weather conditions that invoke sensory memories of a heatwave, the smell of hot pavement or cooling summer rain on the asphalt. A blurring, wavering heat distortion effect, a damp fog or wet puddles on the pavement.

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process */

2020-10-30T18:43:14Z

Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 30 October 2020
Line 227:		Line 227:
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	The first photogrammetry shoot was done outdoors with only one person. It became clear that more interesting poses could be captured with to people and that less post production would be needed to create a mesh of multiple bodies. The second shoot was styled with custom latex pieces by Florian Mathe and was captured indoors in an empty all white room. During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:		The first photogrammetry shoot was done outdoors with only one person. It became clear that more interesting poses could be captured with two people and that less post production would be needed to create a mesh of multiple bodies. The second shoot was styled with custom latex pieces by Florian Mathe and was captured indoors in an empty all white room. During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:

	When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.		When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process */

2020-10-30T18:42:55Z

Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 30 October 2020
Line 227:		Line 227:
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	The first photogrammetry shoot was done outdoors with only one person. It became clear that more interesting poses could be captured with to people and that less post production would be needed to create a mesh of multiple bodies. The second shoot was styled with custom latex pieces by Florian Mathe. During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:		The first photogrammetry shoot was done outdoors with only one person. It became clear that more interesting poses could be captured with to people and that less post production would be needed to create a mesh of multiple bodies. The second shoot was styled with custom latex pieces by Florian Mathe and was captured indoors in an empty all white room. During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:

	When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.		When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process */

2020-10-30T18:42:21Z

Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 30 October 2020
Line 227:		Line 227:
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:		The first photogrammetry shoot was done outdoors with only one person. It became clear that more interesting poses could be captured with to people and that less post production would be needed to create a mesh of multiple bodies. The second shoot was styled with custom latex pieces by Florian Mathe. During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:

	When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.		When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* To be continued development */

2020-10-30T18:36:20Z

To be continued development

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 30 October 2020
Line 341:		Line 341:
	Guided view/ journey with Cinemaschine camera		Guided view/ journey with Cinemaschine camera

	Animation of combined mesh-model		Animation of combined mesh-model i.e. collapsing and folding of street elements, distorting, twisting effects

	Effects on camera view		Effects on camera view i.e. blurring effect

	Sound ~~interplay~~		Sound implementation PD

	Spatial sound		Positioning the poem in the space i.e. Spatial sound

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process */

2020-10-30T18:31:55Z

Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 30 October 2020
Line 230:		Line 230:

	When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.		When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.

			<gallery>
			File:Trnio1.PNG
			File:Trnio2.PNG
			</gallery>


	Metashape is a great photogrammetry software that creates very detailed point clouds and a realistic texture on the model. However, once creating a dense mesh the solid form (sans texture) has many irregularities and a very ‘bumpy’ surface, most probably resulting from the micro-movements of the models. This results in requiring a lot of cleaning up of the models afterwards.		Metashape is a great photogrammetry software that creates very detailed point clouds and a realistic texture on the model. However, once creating a dense mesh the solid form (sans texture) has many irregularities and a very ‘bumpy’ surface, most probably resulting from the micro-movements of the models. This results in requiring a lot of cleaning up of the models afterwards.

			[[File:Metashape_pointcloud.png]]

	My personal preference is Agisofts Recap Photo (which sadly only runs on Windows). The software also sends the images to an external server were the models are created quickly. The way the software deals with ‘irregularities’ or missing information results in very organic colour transitions and fluid, soft shapes. Also the way the texture is displayed in the 3D viewport is ideal.		My personal preference is Agisofts Recap Photo (which sadly only runs on Windows). The software also sends the images to an external server were the models are created quickly. The way the software deals with ‘irregularities’ or missing information results in very organic colour transitions and fluid, soft shapes. Also the way the texture is displayed in the 3D viewport is ideal.

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process */

2020-10-30T18:25:24Z

Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 30 October 2020
Line 228:		Line 228:

	During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:		During the shoot with (living, breathing, moving) people I used 3 different Softwares to compare and have a choice of results:

			When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.

			Metashape is a great photogrammetry software that creates very detailed point clouds and a realistic texture on the model. However, once creating a dense mesh the solid form (sans texture) has many irregularities and a very ‘bumpy’ surface, most probably resulting from the micro-movements of the models. This results in requiring a lot of cleaning up of the models afterwards.

			My personal preference is Agisofts Recap Photo (which sadly only runs on Windows). The software also sends the images to an external server were the models are created quickly. The way the software deals with ‘irregularities’ or missing information results in very organic colour transitions and fluid, soft shapes. Also the way the texture is displayed in the 3D viewport is ideal.

	<gallery>		<gallery>
Line 254:		Line 260:

	[[:File:meshes_process.pdf]]		[[:File:meshes_process.pdf]]


	When using Trnio to scan people the results vary from recognisable to quite distorted. It is generally more unpredictable but the models are calculated on an external server, which gives very quick and ‘low effort’ results, as well as creating more comprehensive material maps.

	Metashape is a great photogrammetry software that creates very detailed point clouds and a realistic texture on the model. However, once creating a dense mesh the solid form (sans texture) has many irregularities and a very ‘bumpy’ surface, most probably resulting from the micro-movements of the models. This results in requiring a lot of cleaning up of the models afterwards.

	My personal preference is Agisofts Recap Photo (which sadly only runs on Windows). The software also sends the images to an external server were the models are created quickly. The way the software deals with ‘irregularities’ or missing information results in very organic colour transitions and fluid, soft shapes. Also the way the texture is displayed in the 3D viewport is ideal.

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process */

2020-10-30T18:23:34Z

Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 30 October 2020
Line 208:		Line 208:
	== Process ==		== Process ==

	This semester I mainly started work on creating my own visual elements, using photogrammetry as technique to transport places, textures and people from the real into the rendered mesh.		This semester I mainly started work on creating my own visual elements. The objective here is to create 'realistic' surfaces and objects that feel tangible. Because of this I enjoy using photogrammetry as technique to transport places, textures and people from the real into the rendered mesh.

	I used a range of different photogrammetry softwares:		I used a range of different photogrammetry softwares:

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process: Integration of Pure Data */

2020-10-30T18:22:26Z

Process: Integration of Pure Data

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 30 October 2020
Line 191:		Line 191:
	From these first patches it becomes clear that the single words that should be re-pitched need to be specified so that the effect is mimicking realistic speech. This needs to be linked to the changing breaks (and subsequent randomised position/timing of the words in the loaded sound file..)		From these first patches it becomes clear that the single words that should be re-pitched need to be specified so that the effect is mimicking realistic speech. This needs to be linked to the changing breaks (and subsequent randomised position/timing of the words in the loaded sound file..)

	~~Continue~~ working with > externals/ audiolab/ pp.sfplayer. pd		Possibly continue working with > externals/ audiolab/ pp.sfplayer. pd
	Or Pitch Shifter:		Or Pitch Shifter:
	[[File:PD- Pitch Shifter.png\|400px]]		[[File:PD- Pitch Shifter.png\|400px]]

Ann-Kristin Jakubek: /* Process: Integration of Pure Data */

2020-10-30T18:20:47Z

Process: Integration of Pure Data

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 30 October 2020
Line 161:		Line 161:
	Possible approach 1:		Possible approach 1:

			Outline what should happen:
	(1) poem plays		(1) poem plays
	(2) rises and falls of the tone/inflection of individual words are detected by pitch		(2) rises and falls of the tone/inflection of individual words are detected by pitch
Line 174:		Line 175:

	Possible approach 2:		Possible approach 2:
			Outline what should happen:
	(1) poem plays		(1) poem plays
	(2) rises and falls of the tone/inflection of individual words are detected		(2) rises and falls of the tone/inflection of individual words are detected