Medien Wiki - User contributions [en]

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-16T14:40:36Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''
[[Media:The_great_balancing_act.pdf|Download PDF]]
----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?

----

'''GENERATED POEM'''

[[File:poem1.png|500px]]

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.png]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:41:15Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''
[[Media:The_great_balancing_act.pdf|Download PDF]]
----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?

----

'''POEM'''

[[File:poem1.png|500px]]

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.png]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

File:Poem1.png

2023-05-15T22:38:48Z

Rxrxrx:

== Copyright status: ==

== Source: ==

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:36:08Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''
[[Media:The_great_balancing_act.pdf|Download PDF]]
----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.png]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:18:52Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''
[[Media:The_great_balancing_act.pdf|Download PDF]]
----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.
My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.png]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

File:The great balancing act.pdf

2023-05-15T22:15:57Z

Rxrxrx:

== Copyright status: ==

== Source: ==

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:15:35Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''
----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.
My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.png]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:09:21Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''

----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.
My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.png]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:08:55Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba2.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''

----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.
My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

[[File:Sa.jpg]]

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

GMU:Construction - Destruction

2023-05-15T22:07:07Z

Rxrxrx: Undo revision 135945 by Rxrxrx (talk)

''[[File:Construction_destruction_s+.jpg|1000px]] ''how DALL·E interprets the topic [https://labs.openai.com/s/bkK0W2zRq1czdCo97bRJLDBF]
''

Construction and deconstruction processes can be observed in all areas of activity, there occurring as build up and dismantling. Both activities are mutually dependent. In order to be able to build up, another structure must be broken down. These activities indicate the limited availability of space and time, the need to be thought of in cycles. In their respective contexts, they develop meaning, morality, violence, hope.
They appear to us in non-ending promises of growth in capitalism, the loss of nature through climate change or massive destructions of wars, but also in the natural decay and the natural growth. We are permanently confronted with the phenomena of construction and destruction and have every reason to reflect on them.
In art, Gustav Metzger in his autodestructive art or Mierle Ladermann-Ukeles in her "Maintenance Art" have positioned themselves on this. "Politics of care" also think in a different way about the future. Where do we stand? How do we deal with construction, destruction, poiesis or decay? What processes do we use for our personal research?
The project proposes a practical approach to the topic and offers the opportunity to experiment with the different forms of constructing or destruction and to address their mechanisms of action and their impact in their environment.

I'm curious how you are interpreting construction and destruction and where you see the fields of activities for artists, designers and architects.

Besides the fach courses of my co-workers who wil, this semester, '''Christian Doeller''' will be assisting us with practical support to develop interactive artefacts within the context of the project.

Meetings in presence '''Tuesdays at 9.15 - 12.30 the Digital Bauhaus Lab Bauhaus Strasse 7''', ground floor.
Start: October 18th

== Readings ==

* [https://monoskop.org/images/c/c9/Stiles_Kristine_1987_Synopsis_of_the_Destruction_in_Art_Symposium_and_Its_Theoretical_Significance.pdf Destruction in Art Symposium]
* Anna Tsing: Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene ISBN 978-1517902360
* Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel: Critical Zones ISBN 9780262044455
* Paul Virilio: Bunker Archaeology ISBN 978-1568980157
* Andrew Pickering: The Mangle in Practice ISBN 978-0-8223-4373-8
* Mathieu Copeland, Clément Dirié (eds.), 'Gustav Metzger. Writings (1953-2016)', Geneva: JRP Editions, 2019, ill. ISBN 978-3-03764-535-2
* Ursula Damm, Mindaugas Gapsevicius: Shared Habitats ISBN 978-3-8376-5647-3
* Sacha Kagan: Art and Sustainability - Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity ISBN 978-3837618037
* [https://times-of-waste.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/YVolkart_From-Trash_to_Waste-1.pdf Yvonne Volkart: From Trash to Waste]
* Hannah Arendt: The freedom to be free https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/320/320067/the-freedom-to-be-free/9780241472880.html

== Timetable Presentations ==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
| '''Week'''
| '''Date'''
| '''Presenter'''

|-
| 9
|06. December 2022
| N.N.
|-
|10
| 13. December 2022
| Mojjo, Martin Müller
|-
|10
| 20. December 2022 (virtual)
| Amelia
|-
|11
| 03 January 2023 (virtual?)
| maps and territories
|-
| 12
|10. January 2023
| Visual Noise (Max), Nodari
|-
| 13
|17. January 2023
| Thai Tai, Rodrigue
|-
|14
| 24. January 2023
| Cosmo, Stefan
|-
|15
| 31. January 2023
| Passion, Mojjo Projektpräsentation, Eirini, Ece
|-
|16
| 07. February 2023
| Final Presentation before semester break (all!)
|}

[[Category:WS22]]

== Artists ==
* [https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/gustav-metzger-7196 Gustav Metzger]
* [https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/capriccio/werkschau-der-amerikanischen-kuenstlerin-joan-jonas-in-muenchen/br-fernsehen/Y3JpZDovL2JyLmRlL3ZpZGVvL2E1NGYwMDA0LTI0ZDUtNGM0Ni1hYjQ1LWI4MWMzYmIwYmY1OA?fbclid=IwAR369QoHCAb8S6Hm9-euv4rZ5T16gOmgdQKG73jVJflTdKjlYvV4jvY2_aQ Joan Jonas in TV]
* [https://vimeo.com/106706806 Yoko Ono Cut piece]
* [https://jennasutela.com/ Jenna Sutela]
* [https://forensic-architecture.org/ Forensic-Architecture]
* [https://www.walidraad.com/ Walid Raad]
* [https://tranxxenolab.net/people/adriana_knouf/ Adriana Knouf]
* [https://archiv.adk.de/bigobjekt/17126 Lutz Dammbeck]
* [https://www.romansigner.ch/ Roman Signer]
* [https://monoskop.org/Mierle_Laderman_Ukeles Mierle Laderman Ukeles]
* [https://www.moma.org/artists/6636 Gordon Matta-Clark]
* [https://aesf.art/ AES+F]
* [http://sheldon-brown.net/ Sheldon Brown]
* [https://refikanadol.com/ Refik Anadol (as a phenomenon rather than an artist)]

== Projects ==
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/ Critical Zones Web Platform]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:lynn-margulis-archive-arbeitstitel Lynn Margulis: Live is a process]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:perimeter-pfynwald-a-soundscape-observatory Marcus Maeder: Perimeter Pfynwald. A Soundscape Observatory]
* [https://www.julianrosefeldt.com/film-and-video-works/detonation-deutschland-1996/installation-views/ Julian Rosefeldt Detonation Deutschland]
* [https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjFyKe8ocb6AhWuhv0HHbjRAK44ChAWegQICBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archplus.net%2Fdownload%2Fartikel%2F5029%2F&usg=AOvVaw1jhIWYdcOJMwoz7aHMDm7p The Architecture Machine Group]
* [https://blogs.otis.edu/in-focus/robots-r-us/ Robotic Chair by Max Dean, Raffaello D'Andrea, Matt Donovan]
* [https://youtu.be/FXY6ocvaZyE Ant Farm Media Burn]
* [https://youtu.be/JRPUjc5jLHM Andreas Angelidakis: The walking building], [https://youtu.be/6EZvOm6zMmk The building who wants to become a mountain (Walking building II]
* [https://vimeo.com/231411671 Johann Grimonprez: dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y]
* [https://www.sfmoma.org/watch/peter-campus-on-his-most-famous-work-and-why-he-hates-it/ Peter Campus on 3 transitions]
== Projects related to Artificial Life ==
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecubes Self replicating cubes]
* [https://news.mit.edu/2019/self-transforming-robot-blocks-jump-spin-flip-identify-each-other-1030 Self-transforming robot]
* [https://alien-project.org/ Artificial Life environment]

== Student work (your contributions) ==

[[Category:WS22]]
[[Category:Projektmodul]]
[[Category:Ursula Damm]]
*[[ Amelia Eickhoff]]
* [[Nodari Gogosashvili]]
* Franziska Kraetschmar
* Claas Matti Julius Krause
* Mojjo Krenz
* [[Maximilian Götz]]
* Victoria Mikhaylova
* [[/Martin Müller]]
* Lan Nguyen
* [Stefan Ralevic][https://www.uni-weimar.de/kunst-und-gestaltung/wiki/User:Stefan_Ralevic]
* [[/Rodrigue Saad]]
* [[/Cosmo Niklas Schüppel]]
* Ece Sungur
* [[/Thai Tai Pham]]
* [[EiriniK]]
*[[/Cagdas Biber]]
* [[Passion Asasu]]

GMU:Construction - Destruction

2023-05-15T22:06:34Z

Rxrxrx: /* Student work (your contributions) */

''[[File:Construction_destruction_s+.jpg|1000px]] ''how DALL·E interprets the topic [https://labs.openai.com/s/bkK0W2zRq1czdCo97bRJLDBF]
''

Construction and deconstruction processes can be observed in all areas of activity, there occurring as build up and dismantling. Both activities are mutually dependent. In order to be able to build up, another structure must be broken down. These activities indicate the limited availability of space and time, the need to be thought of in cycles. In their respective contexts, they develop meaning, morality, violence, hope.
They appear to us in non-ending promises of growth in capitalism, the loss of nature through climate change or massive destructions of wars, but also in the natural decay and the natural growth. We are permanently confronted with the phenomena of construction and destruction and have every reason to reflect on them.
In art, Gustav Metzger in his autodestructive art or Mierle Ladermann-Ukeles in her "Maintenance Art" have positioned themselves on this. "Politics of care" also think in a different way about the future. Where do we stand? How do we deal with construction, destruction, poiesis or decay? What processes do we use for our personal research?
The project proposes a practical approach to the topic and offers the opportunity to experiment with the different forms of constructing or destruction and to address their mechanisms of action and their impact in their environment.

I'm curious how you are interpreting construction and destruction and where you see the fields of activities for artists, designers and architects.

Besides the fach courses of my co-workers who wil, this semester, '''Christian Doeller''' will be assisting us with practical support to develop interactive artefacts within the context of the project.

Meetings in presence '''Tuesdays at 9.15 - 12.30 the Digital Bauhaus Lab Bauhaus Strasse 7''', ground floor.
Start: October 18th

== Readings ==

* [https://monoskop.org/images/c/c9/Stiles_Kristine_1987_Synopsis_of_the_Destruction_in_Art_Symposium_and_Its_Theoretical_Significance.pdf Destruction in Art Symposium]
* Anna Tsing: Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene ISBN 978-1517902360
* Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel: Critical Zones ISBN 9780262044455
* Paul Virilio: Bunker Archaeology ISBN 978-1568980157
* Andrew Pickering: The Mangle in Practice ISBN 978-0-8223-4373-8
* Mathieu Copeland, Clément Dirié (eds.), 'Gustav Metzger. Writings (1953-2016)', Geneva: JRP Editions, 2019, ill. ISBN 978-3-03764-535-2
* Ursula Damm, Mindaugas Gapsevicius: Shared Habitats ISBN 978-3-8376-5647-3
* Sacha Kagan: Art and Sustainability - Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity ISBN 978-3837618037
* [https://times-of-waste.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/YVolkart_From-Trash_to_Waste-1.pdf Yvonne Volkart: From Trash to Waste]
* Hannah Arendt: The freedom to be free https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/320/320067/the-freedom-to-be-free/9780241472880.html

== Timetable Presentations ==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
| '''Week'''
| '''Date'''
| '''Presenter'''

|-
| 9
|06. December 2022
| N.N.
|-
|10
| 13. December 2022
| Mojjo, Martin Müller
|-
|10
| 20. December 2022 (virtual)
| Amelia
|-
|11
| 03 January 2023 (virtual?)
| maps and territories
|-
| 12
|10. January 2023
| Visual Noise (Max), Nodari
|-
| 13
|17. January 2023
| Thai Tai, Rodrigue
|-
|14
| 24. January 2023
| Cosmo, Stefan
|-
|15
| 31. January 2023
| Passion, Mojjo Projektpräsentation, Eirini, Ece
|-
|16
| 07. February 2023
| Final Presentation before semester break (all!)
|}

[[Category:WS22]]

== Artists ==
* [https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/gustav-metzger-7196 Gustav Metzger]
* [https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/capriccio/werkschau-der-amerikanischen-kuenstlerin-joan-jonas-in-muenchen/br-fernsehen/Y3JpZDovL2JyLmRlL3ZpZGVvL2E1NGYwMDA0LTI0ZDUtNGM0Ni1hYjQ1LWI4MWMzYmIwYmY1OA?fbclid=IwAR369QoHCAb8S6Hm9-euv4rZ5T16gOmgdQKG73jVJflTdKjlYvV4jvY2_aQ Joan Jonas in TV]
* [https://vimeo.com/106706806 Yoko Ono Cut piece]
* [https://jennasutela.com/ Jenna Sutela]
* [https://forensic-architecture.org/ Forensic-Architecture]
* [https://www.walidraad.com/ Walid Raad]
* [https://tranxxenolab.net/people/adriana_knouf/ Adriana Knouf]
* [https://archiv.adk.de/bigobjekt/17126 Lutz Dammbeck]
* [https://www.romansigner.ch/ Roman Signer]
* [https://monoskop.org/Mierle_Laderman_Ukeles Mierle Laderman Ukeles]
* [https://www.moma.org/artists/6636 Gordon Matta-Clark]
* [https://aesf.art/ AES+F]
* [http://sheldon-brown.net/ Sheldon Brown]
* [https://refikanadol.com/ Refik Anadol (as a phenomenon rather than an artist)]

== Projects ==
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/ Critical Zones Web Platform]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:lynn-margulis-archive-arbeitstitel Lynn Margulis: Live is a process]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:perimeter-pfynwald-a-soundscape-observatory Marcus Maeder: Perimeter Pfynwald. A Soundscape Observatory]
* [https://www.julianrosefeldt.com/film-and-video-works/detonation-deutschland-1996/installation-views/ Julian Rosefeldt Detonation Deutschland]
* [https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjFyKe8ocb6AhWuhv0HHbjRAK44ChAWegQICBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archplus.net%2Fdownload%2Fartikel%2F5029%2F&usg=AOvVaw1jhIWYdcOJMwoz7aHMDm7p The Architecture Machine Group]
* [https://blogs.otis.edu/in-focus/robots-r-us/ Robotic Chair by Max Dean, Raffaello D'Andrea, Matt Donovan]
* [https://youtu.be/FXY6ocvaZyE Ant Farm Media Burn]
* [https://youtu.be/JRPUjc5jLHM Andreas Angelidakis: The walking building], [https://youtu.be/6EZvOm6zMmk The building who wants to become a mountain (Walking building II]
* [https://vimeo.com/231411671 Johann Grimonprez: dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y]
* [https://www.sfmoma.org/watch/peter-campus-on-his-most-famous-work-and-why-he-hates-it/ Peter Campus on 3 transitions]
== Projects related to Artificial Life ==
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecubes Self replicating cubes]
* [https://news.mit.edu/2019/self-transforming-robot-blocks-jump-spin-flip-identify-each-other-1030 Self-transforming robot]
* [https://alien-project.org/ Artificial Life environment]

== Student work (your contributions) ==

[[Category:WS22]]
[[Category:Projektmodul]]
[[Category:Ursula Damm]]
*[[ Amelia Eickhoff]]
* [[Nodari Gogosashvili]]
* Franziska Kraetschmar
* Claas Matti Julius Krause
* Mojjo Krenz
* [[Maximilian Götz]]
* Victoria Mikhaylova
* [[/Martin Müller]]
* Lan Nguyen
* [Stefan Ralevic][https://www.uni-weimar.de/kunst-und-gestaltung/wiki/User:Stefan_Ralevic]
* [[Rodrigue Saad]]
* [[/Cosmo Niklas Schüppel]]
* Ece Sungur
* [[/Thai Tai Pham]]
* [[EiriniK]]
*[[/Cagdas Biber]]
* [[Passion Asasu]]

File:Sa.png

2023-05-15T22:06:04Z

Rxrxrx:

== Copyright status: ==

== Licensing ==
{{self|c}}
== Source: ==

File:Tgba2.jpg

2023-05-15T22:05:48Z

Rxrxrx:

== Copyright status: ==

== Licensing ==
{{self|c}}
== Source: ==

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T22:04:08Z

Rxrxrx:

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

[[File:tgba.jpg|1000px|link=https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy|centre]]
''https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy''

----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.
My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

File:Tgba.jpg

2023-05-15T21:57:26Z

Rxrxrx:

== Copyright status: ==

== Licensing ==
{{self|c}}
== Source: ==

GMU:Construction - Destruction/Rodrigue Saad

2023-05-15T21:56:19Z

Rxrxrx: Created page with "THE GREAT BALANCING ACT https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy ---- '''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM''' ''"You’re so quiet / you’re al..."

THE GREAT BALANCING ACT

https://vimeo.com/827003966?share=copy

----

'''THE SILENT EQUILIBRIUM'''

''"You’re so quiet / you’re almost tomorrow"
Ocean Vuong, from ‘Into the Breach’, Night Sky With Exit Wounds''

Form yesterday’s noise, I compile a selection of texts. These texts range from personal journals to future manifestations. Today, through the sober eyes of my machine, I am able to take control over my experiences and aspirations. The result; a generated poem forming the basis of this experiment and video performance. With the help of some basic python programming, I assemble and rearrange these written words in an attempt at organizing my inner environment and gaining a sense of structure and control.

From the earliest urban settlements, humans have sought to establish structures that provide a sense of control over their environments. This need for organization is rooted in our basic survival instict. Since then, our outer environments have changed drastically. The human experience has advanced onto a different playfield, surrounded by concrete towers and complex machineries. Nowadays, we find ourselves facing different types of dangers, ones of the modern day world, of man made systems and complex hierarchies. Today’s human is left feeling weak and margenalized. What will tomorrow’s world bring?

Eremocene; is what scientist Edward O. Wilson has named the coming geological era. Life has become lonely for the human species in the Eremocene. The age of loneliness is characterised by natural destruction, a global loss of biodiversity and the dominance of the technosphere over the biosphere.
As this eminent hazard seems immutable, it’s time to start thinking inwards. How can we transcend our current state of being in order to adapt to tomorrow’s world? How can we find inspiration from our surrounding environment and implement it inwards? How can we reach a post human state, while not losing what makes us most human? How can a more equalized being find a sense of balance in rationality?

Humans, delicate creatures, are caught up in the “rhythms, pulsions and patternings of non-human forces,” wrote Mark Fisher, describing the eerie knowledge that there are always other presences sharing our interiority with us. “There is no inside except as a folding of the outside”, Fisher continues: “the mirror cracks, I am an other, and I always was.”

A destruction of the self is necessary for a construction of a newer system of being, a decolonized perspective that can stand its ground in tomorrow’s world. An introspective reflection inwards is necessary at transforming the inner self in direct relation to the outer self.

Homeoestasis; derives from Greek, with home: “similar”, and stasis: “stable”. Homeoestasis is any self-regulating process by which biological or physical systems tend to maintain stability while adjusting to conditions that are optimal for survival. If homeoestasis is successful, life continues; if unsuccessful, disaster or death ensues. The stability attained is actually a dynamic equilibrium, in which continuous change occurs yet relatively uniform conditions prevail.

----

'''THE INVISIBLE NOW'''

Since the industrial revolution, human life has undergone a comprehensive transformation. This has led to a growing complexity of machines, ranging from tiny components to invisible software. With an increasing reliance on machines, they have become an integral part of our existence and an extension of our capabilities. For instance, smartphones have become an extension of human memory, senses, and mental abilities, even enabling us to transcend the boundaries of time and space.

The line between humans and technology is becoming further more blurred, making it challenging to discern where humans end and machines begin. What does this integration mean for the human condition? To what extent have we assimilated into this hybrid of organism and machine? And in which ways is it already limiting us? Taking all of this into consideration, the notion of the cyborg seems very present here and now, and in simpler forms than futuristic visions.

A Cyborg, as Donna Haraway explains, is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.

The cyborg, according to some, goes beyond just enhancing human capabilities but also challenges the very concept of what it means to be human. As Claudia Springer noted in 1996, "the cyborg undermines the very concept of 'human'”. But what truly defines our humanity? Is it our emotions? or perhaps our memories? is it our experiences and aspirations? our rationality? or even our weaknesses?

The stakes are high as the concept of the cyborg questions our very essence. That's why it is often seen as a form of "dehumanization." Yet, this in fact may also offer a type of liberation, one that could open up exciting possibilities beyond the limitations of the human condition.

----

'''THE POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE'''

Artificial intelligence in itself is a powerful force that has been redefining knowledge, communication, and power. It is transforming the very foundations of our social, cultural, and political structures, as well as shaping our understanding of the human body, subjectivity, and identity: the basic essence of what we are and what we can become.
My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.

My goal with this work is to investigate the expanding role of artificial intelligence in our modern day world, as I put into focus the relationship between desire, illusion and danger, the business of the spectacle, how we anthropomorphize nonhuman entities, how empathy emerges, and the overall politics of artificial intelligence.
But what forms of politics does artificial intelligence propagate? Whose interests does it serve, and who bears the greatest risk of harm? Should there be limitations placed on the utilization of AI?

Artificial intelligence has always been an infrastructure, an industry, a form of exercising power, and a way of seeing. It embodies a complex set of expectations, ideologies, desires, and fears.

In this way, AI can be a tool for power and control, but also for justice and liberation, depending on who wields it and for what purposes. As Ursula Franklin writes, “The viability of technology, like democracy, depends in the end on the practice of justice and on the enforcement of limits to power.”

Through this piece, the political nature of being human is intertwined with artificial intelligence and the performance at hand. The performance itself has political intentions and draws inspiration from the performative in politics. The mise-en-scene and visual language of the accompanying video intentionally references the theatricality of life itself.

----

'''THE AMPLIFIED REALM'''

The blending of human and machine can manifest itself in several ways. However, will we ever reach a point where our emotional intelligence itself can be imparted through adequate training and resources? Such a perspective suggests that emotional intelligence is an inherent, autonomous quality, a separate entity from the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts that shape it.

In this work, through the use of Python code, my experiences and ambitions have been transformed into a more detached and structured form, one that reflects my hybrid presence and altered identity. This transformation is amplified through the speakers, reverberating onto my surrounding and creating a new manifestation of my self in the outer realm. The tower of technosphere here serves as an amplifying tool to reach as many people as possible through both sound and sight. However, do words still hold any rational validity when removed from their subjective context?

The towering height of the structure instills a feeling of peril, precariousness, and unpredictability, infusing each spoken word with a heightened sense of risk. Through this, I am able to attain a sense of equilibrium over my own voice as I let go of each word. This transformative journey, which begins from within and expands outward, is equally liberating and daunting.

The emptiness of the surrounding echoes the words right back to me, resembling the biological geolocation found in many animals, as well as acoustic locators and radars that detect prey and avoid obstacles through acoustic wayfinding. The chaos in the sonic output creates a certain poetic notion, reminiscent of the sounds of modern revolution.

As Hannah Arendt said, "People can only be free in relation to one another." However, in this video performance, the generated poem speech is being performed solely to the self in the presence of the camera. This dynamic of empty space, human self, and machine creates a necessary energetic interplay. It raises questions of; who the performer and who the observer? Who is the leader and who is the follower? Who holds the power in the hierarchical dynamics of today’s world? Can one be truly free in relation to themselves?
POEM

----

'''PYTHON CODE'''

----

'''READINGS'''

''A Cyborg Manifesto
By Donna Haraway''

http://pdf-objects.com/files/Meerdo-HarawayCyborgManifesto.pdf

''The Atlast of AI - Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
By Kate Crawford''

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

''Hegel in a Wired Brain
By Slavoj Žižek''

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I2u2a8OTaIxzDvLJd49D-fuY43qvss4x/view?usp=share_link

''We are all cyborgs: How machines can be a feminist tool
By Nour Ahmad''

https://www.mediasupport.org/navigating-a-changing-world/we-are-all-cyborgs-how-machines-can-be-a-feminist-tool/#:~:text=In%20A%20Cyborg%20Manifesto%2C%20Haraway,deemed%20cultural%20or%20otherwise%20natural

''We Are Borg: Cyborgs and the Subject of Communication
By David Gunkel''

https://www.gunkelweb.com/articles/we_are_borg.pdf

GMU:Construction - Destruction

2023-05-15T18:51:29Z

Rxrxrx: /* Student work (your contributions) */

GMU:Construction - Destruction

2023-05-15T18:48:44Z

Rxrxrx: /* Student work (your contributions) */

''[[File:Construction_destruction_s+.jpg|1000px]] ''how DALL·E interprets the topic [https://labs.openai.com/s/bkK0W2zRq1czdCo97bRJLDBF]
''

Construction and deconstruction processes can be observed in all areas of activity, there occurring as build up and dismantling. Both activities are mutually dependent. In order to be able to build up, another structure must be broken down. These activities indicate the limited availability of space and time, the need to be thought of in cycles. In their respective contexts, they develop meaning, morality, violence, hope.
They appear to us in non-ending promises of growth in capitalism, the loss of nature through climate change or massive destructions of wars, but also in the natural decay and the natural growth. We are permanently confronted with the phenomena of construction and destruction and have every reason to reflect on them.
In art, Gustav Metzger in his autodestructive art or Mierle Ladermann-Ukeles in her "Maintenance Art" have positioned themselves on this. "Politics of care" also think in a different way about the future. Where do we stand? How do we deal with construction, destruction, poiesis or decay? What processes do we use for our personal research?
The project proposes a practical approach to the topic and offers the opportunity to experiment with the different forms of constructing or destruction and to address their mechanisms of action and their impact in their environment.

I'm curious how you are interpreting construction and destruction and where you see the fields of activities for artists, designers and architects.

Besides the fach courses of my co-workers who wil, this semester, '''Christian Doeller''' will be assisting us with practical support to develop interactive artefacts within the context of the project.

Meetings in presence '''Tuesdays at 9.15 - 12.30 the Digital Bauhaus Lab Bauhaus Strasse 7''', ground floor.
Start: October 18th

== Readings ==

* [https://monoskop.org/images/c/c9/Stiles_Kristine_1987_Synopsis_of_the_Destruction_in_Art_Symposium_and_Its_Theoretical_Significance.pdf Destruction in Art Symposium]
* Anna Tsing: Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene ISBN 978-1517902360
* Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel: Critical Zones ISBN 9780262044455
* Paul Virilio: Bunker Archaeology ISBN 978-1568980157
* Andrew Pickering: The Mangle in Practice ISBN 978-0-8223-4373-8
* Mathieu Copeland, Clément Dirié (eds.), 'Gustav Metzger. Writings (1953-2016)', Geneva: JRP Editions, 2019, ill. ISBN 978-3-03764-535-2
* Ursula Damm, Mindaugas Gapsevicius: Shared Habitats ISBN 978-3-8376-5647-3
* Sacha Kagan: Art and Sustainability - Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity ISBN 978-3837618037
* [https://times-of-waste.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/YVolkart_From-Trash_to_Waste-1.pdf Yvonne Volkart: From Trash to Waste]
* Hannah Arendt: The freedom to be free https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/320/320067/the-freedom-to-be-free/9780241472880.html

== Timetable Presentations ==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
| '''Week'''
| '''Date'''
| '''Presenter'''

|-
| 9
|06. December 2022
| N.N.
|-
|10
| 13. December 2022
| Mojjo, Martin Müller
|-
|10
| 20. December 2022 (virtual)
| Amelia
|-
|11
| 03 January 2023 (virtual?)
| maps and territories
|-
| 12
|10. January 2023
| Visual Noise (Max), Nodari
|-
| 13
|17. January 2023
| Thai Tai, Rodrigue
|-
|14
| 24. January 2023
| Cosmo, Stefan
|-
|15
| 31. January 2023
| Passion, Mojjo Projektpräsentation, Eirini, Ece
|-
|16
| 07. February 2023
| Final Presentation before semester break (all!)
|}

[[Category:WS22]]

== Artists ==
* [https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/gustav-metzger-7196 Gustav Metzger]
* [https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/capriccio/werkschau-der-amerikanischen-kuenstlerin-joan-jonas-in-muenchen/br-fernsehen/Y3JpZDovL2JyLmRlL3ZpZGVvL2E1NGYwMDA0LTI0ZDUtNGM0Ni1hYjQ1LWI4MWMzYmIwYmY1OA?fbclid=IwAR369QoHCAb8S6Hm9-euv4rZ5T16gOmgdQKG73jVJflTdKjlYvV4jvY2_aQ Joan Jonas in TV]
* [https://vimeo.com/106706806 Yoko Ono Cut piece]
* [https://jennasutela.com/ Jenna Sutela]
* [https://forensic-architecture.org/ Forensic-Architecture]
* [https://www.walidraad.com/ Walid Raad]
* [https://tranxxenolab.net/people/adriana_knouf/ Adriana Knouf]
* [https://archiv.adk.de/bigobjekt/17126 Lutz Dammbeck]
* [https://www.romansigner.ch/ Roman Signer]
* [https://monoskop.org/Mierle_Laderman_Ukeles Mierle Laderman Ukeles]
* [https://www.moma.org/artists/6636 Gordon Matta-Clark]
* [https://aesf.art/ AES+F]
* [http://sheldon-brown.net/ Sheldon Brown]
* [https://refikanadol.com/ Refik Anadol (as a phenomenon rather than an artist)]

== Projects ==
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/ Critical Zones Web Platform]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:lynn-margulis-archive-arbeitstitel Lynn Margulis: Live is a process]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:perimeter-pfynwald-a-soundscape-observatory Marcus Maeder: Perimeter Pfynwald. A Soundscape Observatory]
* [https://www.julianrosefeldt.com/film-and-video-works/detonation-deutschland-1996/installation-views/ Julian Rosefeldt Detonation Deutschland]
* [https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjFyKe8ocb6AhWuhv0HHbjRAK44ChAWegQICBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archplus.net%2Fdownload%2Fartikel%2F5029%2F&usg=AOvVaw1jhIWYdcOJMwoz7aHMDm7p The Architecture Machine Group]
* [https://blogs.otis.edu/in-focus/robots-r-us/ Robotic Chair by Max Dean, Raffaello D'Andrea, Matt Donovan]
* [https://youtu.be/FXY6ocvaZyE Ant Farm Media Burn]
* [https://youtu.be/JRPUjc5jLHM Andreas Angelidakis: The walking building], [https://youtu.be/6EZvOm6zMmk The building who wants to become a mountain (Walking building II]
* [https://vimeo.com/231411671 Johann Grimonprez: dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y]
* [https://www.sfmoma.org/watch/peter-campus-on-his-most-famous-work-and-why-he-hates-it/ Peter Campus on 3 transitions]
== Projects related to Artificial Life ==
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecubes Self replicating cubes]
* [https://news.mit.edu/2019/self-transforming-robot-blocks-jump-spin-flip-identify-each-other-1030 Self-transforming robot]
* [https://alien-project.org/ Artificial Life environment]

== Student work (your contributions) ==

[[Category:WS22]]
[[Category:Projektmodul]]
[[Category:Ursula Damm]]
*[[ Amelia Eickhoff]]
* [[Nodari Gogosashvili]]
* Franziska Kraetschmar
* Claas Matti Julius Krause
* Mojjo Krenz
* [[Maximilian Götz]]
* Victoria Mikhaylova
* [[/Martin Müller]]
* Lan Nguyen
* [Stefan Ralevic][https://www.uni-weimar.de/kunst-und-gestaltung/wiki/User:Stefan_Ralevic]
* Rodrigue Saad
* [[/Cosmo Niklas Schüppel]]
* Ece Sungur
* [[/Thai Tai Pham]]
* [[EiriniK]]
*[[/Cagdas Biber]]
* [[Passion Asasu]]

GMU:Construction - Destruction

2023-01-16T12:49:04Z

Rxrxrx: /* Timetable Presentations */

''[[File:Construction_destruction_s+.jpg|1000px]] ''how DALL·E interprets the topic [https://labs.openai.com/s/bkK0W2zRq1czdCo97bRJLDBF]
''

Construction and deconstruction processes can be observed in all areas of activity, there occurring as build up and dismantling. Both activities are mutually dependent. In order to be able to build up, another structure must be broken down. These activities indicate the limited availability of space and time, the need to be thought of in cycles. In their respective contexts, they develop meaning, morality, violence, hope.
They appear to us in non-ending promises of growth in capitalism, the loss of nature through climate change or massive destructions of wars, but also in the natural decay and the natural growth. We are permanently confronted with the phenomena of construction and destruction and have every reason to reflect on them.
In art, Gustav Metzger in his autodestructive art or Mierle Ladermann-Ukeles in her "Maintenance Art" have positioned themselves on this. "Politics of care" also think in a different way about the future. Where do we stand? How do we deal with construction, destruction, poiesis or decay? What processes do we use for our personal research?
The project proposes a practical approach to the topic and offers the opportunity to experiment with the different forms of constructing or destruction and to address their mechanisms of action and their impact in their environment.

I'm curious how you are interpreting construction and destruction and where you see the fields of activities for artists, designers and architects.

Besides the fach courses of my co-workers who wil, this semester, '''Christian Doeller''' will be assisting us with practical support to develop interactive artefacts within the context of the project.

Meetings in presence '''Tuesdays at 9.15 - 12.30 the Digital Bauhaus Lab Bauhaus Strasse 7''', ground floor.
Start: October 18th

== Readings ==

* [https://monoskop.org/images/c/c9/Stiles_Kristine_1987_Synopsis_of_the_Destruction_in_Art_Symposium_and_Its_Theoretical_Significance.pdf Destruction in Art Symposium]
* Anna Tsing: Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene ISBN 978-1517902360
* Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel: Critical Zones ISBN 9780262044455
* Paul Virilio: Bunker Archaeology ISBN 978-1568980157
* Andrew Pickering: The Mangle in Practice ISBN 978-0-8223-4373-8
* Mathieu Copeland, Clément Dirié (eds.), 'Gustav Metzger. Writings (1953-2016)', Geneva: JRP Editions, 2019, ill. ISBN 978-3-03764-535-2
* Ursula Damm, Mindaugas Gapsevicius: Shared Habitats ISBN 978-3-8376-5647-3
* Sacha Kagan: Art and Sustainability - Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity ISBN 978-3837618037
* [https://times-of-waste.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/YVolkart_From-Trash_to_Waste-1.pdf Yvonne Volkart: From Trash to Waste]
* Hannah Arendt: The freedom to be free https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/320/320067/the-freedom-to-be-free/9780241472880.html

== Timetable Presentations ==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
| '''Week'''
| '''Date'''
| '''Presenter'''

|-
| 9
|06. December 2022
| N.N.
|-
|10
| 13. December 2022
| Mojjo, Martin Müller
|-
|10
| 20. December 2022 (virtual)
| Amelia
|-
|11
| 03 January 2023 (virtual?)
| maps and territories
|-
| 12
|10. January 2023
| Visual Noise (Max), Nodari
|-
| 13
|17. January 2023
| Thai Tai, Rodrigue
|-
|14
| 24. January 2023
| Cosmo, Stefan
|-
|15
| 31. January 2023
| Passion, Mojjo Projektpräsentation, Eirini
|-
|16
| 07. February 2023
| Final Presentation before semester break (all!)
|}

[[Category:WS22]]

== Artists ==
* [https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/gustav-metzger-7196 Gustav Metzger]
* [https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/capriccio/werkschau-der-amerikanischen-kuenstlerin-joan-jonas-in-muenchen/br-fernsehen/Y3JpZDovL2JyLmRlL3ZpZGVvL2E1NGYwMDA0LTI0ZDUtNGM0Ni1hYjQ1LWI4MWMzYmIwYmY1OA?fbclid=IwAR369QoHCAb8S6Hm9-euv4rZ5T16gOmgdQKG73jVJflTdKjlYvV4jvY2_aQ Joan Jonas in TV]
* [https://vimeo.com/106706806 Yoko Ono Cut piece]
* [https://jennasutela.com/ Jenna Sutela]
* [https://forensic-architecture.org/ Forensic-Architecture]
* [https://www.walidraad.com/ Walid Raad]
* [https://tranxxenolab.net/people/adriana_knouf/ Adriana Knouf]
* [https://archiv.adk.de/bigobjekt/17126 Lutz Dammbeck]
* [https://www.romansigner.ch/ Roman Signer]
* [https://monoskop.org/Mierle_Laderman_Ukeles Mierle Laderman Ukeles]
* [https://www.moma.org/artists/6636 Gordon Matta-Clark]
* [https://aesf.art/ AES+F]
* [http://sheldon-brown.net/ Sheldon Brown]
* [https://refikanadol.com/ Refik Anadol (as a phenomenon rather than an artist)]

== Projects ==
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/ Critical Zones Web Platform]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:lynn-margulis-archive-arbeitstitel Lynn Margulis: Live is a process]
* [https://critical-zones.zkm.de/#!/detail:perimeter-pfynwald-a-soundscape-observatory Marcus Maeder: Perimeter Pfynwald. A Soundscape Observatory]
* [https://www.julianrosefeldt.com/film-and-video-works/detonation-deutschland-1996/installation-views/ Julian Rosefeldt Detonation Deutschland]
* [https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjFyKe8ocb6AhWuhv0HHbjRAK44ChAWegQICBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archplus.net%2Fdownload%2Fartikel%2F5029%2F&usg=AOvVaw1jhIWYdcOJMwoz7aHMDm7p The Architecture Machine Group]
* [https://blogs.otis.edu/in-focus/robots-r-us/ Robotic Chair by Max Dean, Raffaello D'Andrea, Matt Donovan]
* [https://youtu.be/FXY6ocvaZyE Ant Farm Media Burn]
* [https://youtu.be/JRPUjc5jLHM Andreas Angelidakis: The walking building], [https://youtu.be/6EZvOm6zMmk The building who wants to become a mountain (Walking building II]
* [https://vimeo.com/231411671 Johann Grimonprez: dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y]
* [https://www.sfmoma.org/watch/peter-campus-on-his-most-famous-work-and-why-he-hates-it/ Peter Campus on 3 transitions]
== Projects related to Artificial Life ==
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecubes Self replicating cubes]
* [https://news.mit.edu/2019/self-transforming-robot-blocks-jump-spin-flip-identify-each-other-1030 Self-transforming robot]
* [https://alien-project.org/ Artificial Life environment]

== Student work (your contributions) ==

[[Category:WS22]]
[[Category:Projektmodul]]
[[Category:Ursula Damm]]
*[[ Amelia Eickhoff]]
* [[Nodari Gogosashvili]]
* Franziska Kraetschmar
* Claas Matti Julius Krause
* Mojjo Krenz
* [[Maximilian Götz]]
* Victoria Mikhaylova
* [[/Martin Müller]]
* Lan Nguyen
* [Stefan Ralevic][https://www.uni-weimar.de/kunst-und-gestaltung/wiki/User:Stefan_Ralevic]
* Rodrige Saad
* [[/Cosmo Niklas Schüppel]]
* Ece Sungur
* [[/Thai Tai Pham]]
* [[EiriniK]]
*[[/Cagdas Biber]]